Last week’s OMMA Social was a good event.  Relatively intimate.  Good insight.  Encouraging discourse.  Very well run and organized.

But the one takeaway I rather would not have gotten from the event was that some agencies in the social media category need an attitude adjustment.  The level of defensive arrogance and condescension from select agencies who felt compelled to dismiss and degrade client wants and needs as it relates to the measurement (and associated ROI) of social media was astounding.

From the tired and meaningless riff “what’s the ROI of putting on your pants in the morning” to the astonishing comment “data will destroy social media,” the message I got was that client demands for placing a return/value on increasing expenditures in social media were not worthy of serious consideration.  That asking for accountability and a better understanding of the value of social media within an enterprise’s marketing ecosystem was a drag and “will hamper innovation.”

And some agencies wonder why clients torture them so much?

OMMA Social was not intended as a gathering of social media purists.  This was a conference for agencies, platforms, services, and clients who are in the BUSINESS of embracing and employing social media for marketing and conversational purposes.  A business where C-suites in most organizations have begun approving investment in social media but expect a level of meaningful measurements and metrics to justify spend.

This isn’t to say all the agencies were obstructionist.  I was intrigued by some of the ideas put forward about merging predictive analytics with social data and about measuring the value and impact of social investments by triangulating online chatter with integrated offline campaigns data.  It’s good to hear that the grown up agencies are serious about trying to find a solution to client (and medium) needs.

I empathize with the lack of conclusions and simple explanations of social media measurement and agreed upon industry KPIs.  There are lots of numbers but no firm insight into what they all mean.  It’s tough.  A work in progress.  I get it.

But to not offer up ideas is unacceptable.  I embrace the medium and understand the visceral and empirical power of social.  And because I love what social is doing and can do for culture and business, I believe it’s imperative to figure out a measurement and analytics solution.  Not doing this hurts the evangelicalism of and the marketing investment in social media.

To obstructionist agencies I say simply that if you don’t want to talk about the need to measure or the need for data or the demand for business conclusions, you don’t have to take a client’s money.  Or we can make it even easier — we won’t give it to you.  It’s really that simple.

{ 0 comments }

THE SEVEN C’s OF SOCIAL MARKETING

by Gerard on January 28, 2010

in Social Media, Strategy

At this week’s OMMA Social event, Ripple6’s Rich Ullman gave a simple, succinct rundown of the 7 C’s that make up social marketing — the 7 C’s that allow for the scaling of tactics into a strategy.

  1. Master the art of the CONTINUOUS CAMPAIGN
  2. COLLABORATE with your audience/fans/customers
  3. Forget CLICKS. It’s all about measurement.
  4. Encourage and CURATE CONVERSATIONS
  5. Support COMMUNITIES
  6. CREATIVITY = CONTENT + CONTEXT
  7. CONNECT it all together

Think he missed any?

{ 2 comments }

WHO ARE THE TWITTER INFLUENCERS?

by Gerard on October 1, 2009

in Social Media

Twitter Influencers

With eMarketer predicting US Twitter monthly usage hitting 18MM in 2009, it’s worth looking at who wields the most influence on Twitter.  Is it the users with the most followers?  The users with the greatest follower-to-followee ratio?  The Celebrities?  The Digerati?  The Newsers?

The folks at Web Ecology Project think they have found the answer.  In their recent report titled “The Influentials:  New Approaches for Analyzing Influence on Twitter”, they conclude that Newsers and Celebrities are the most influential groups on Twitter.

Choosing to look beyond sheer numbers of followers as a signifier of influence, WEP examined an ecosystem of 134,654 tweets, 90,130 responses, 15,866,629 followers, and 899,773 followees over a 10-day period and focused on the relationships and interactions between Materialistic (those who collect followers to push content) and Conversationalist (those who collect followers to focus on personal conversations) influencers and others.

Web Ecology Project defines influence as the potential of an action of a user to initiate further action by another user.  By looking at the four markers of influence (@ reply, RT retweet, @ mention, & “via” attribution) and weighing for numbers of followers and the relative amount of content produced, WEP concludes that Newsers @cnnbrk and @mashable and Celebrities @the_real_shaq and @aplusk are the top Twitter influencers.  I highly recommend you download the entire report to best understand how they arrived at these conclusions.

WEP’s approach and methodolgy are innovative but ultimately limiting.  I want more than just the obvious big names.  In an age of no center, where very few — some would argue zero — wield mass influence, this list is the tip of the influencer iceberg.  Using WEP’s methodology, the real interest will be in revealing the influencers in a multitude of communities.

Forget Ashton Kutcher and CNN — they play to the mythical center.  I’m more interested in the margins, the niches.  The sports influencers.  The youth influencers.  The business influencers.  The mommy influencers.  The tech influencers.  The meat-and-potatoes influencers of every community imaginable.  Those are the real influencers.  And that’s who I and many other marketers want find out about.

{ 1 comment }

MEASURING SOCIAL MEDIA ROI

September 22, 2009

The keys to measuring social media ROI are to establish goals, to test, to mine data from assorted analytics sources, and to triangulate the data into conclusions.

Read the full article →

AND THE YOUNG SHALL LEAD

August 26, 2009

The rapid pace of digital development and Millennial employees’ greater comfort with all things digital now means Millennials deserve a seat alongside seasoned executives if companies hope to compete in the digital market.

Read the full article →